If you are not satisfied with the outcome of your trial, it is your right to appeal the case. Since not all criminal attorneys can handle appeals work, look specifically for a federal or Florida appeals attorney.
Information Provided by Florida Appeals Lawyer Joe Bodiford
What is an appeal?
An appeal is the process by which a higher court reviews the case for errors. Errors can be in the judge’s rulings, the sentence that was imposed, in the jury trial process. The issues are really unlimited, and are only as good as the trial lawyer that set them in motion. In other words, your trial attorney has to make motions and objections during your trial. The trial attorney has to make a good record in case you lose, so that the issues are “preserved” for the higher court to review.
An appeal is NOT a re-trial, or a time for the higher court to look at the facts and decide that someone is not guilty. While there are very limited circumstances in which an appellate court can review the facts, an appeal is a review of the PROCESS. The higher court looks to make sure that all of the legal rulings were correct and that your rights were properly protected.
When would I need to appeal?
If you have gone to trial and lost, you should appeal. If your attorney filed a motion to suppress and the judge denied it, you should appeal. If you went to hearing on a violation of probation and were found to be in violation, you should appeal.
You should appeal any adverse decision against you. If you do not, then you may be giving up not only a chance to have your case reversed, but the right to pursue other avenues of relief later. For most post-conviction motions, you have to have appealed your case first.
How do I appeal my conviction or sentence?
An appeal is a very complicated process, and should only be handled by an attorney skilled at preparing the record and writing the brief. Many trial attorneys don’t even know how to file for an appeal. Joe Bodiford regularly lectures trial attorneys in this area, in his seminar Criminal Appeals: Bridging the Gap from Trial to Appeal.
Do I need a lawyer to appeal?
Technically, no. Practically, YES. The appeals process is too complicated for someone not trained in criminal appeals—even for most criminal lawyers. Not only is it difficult to make sure the record has all the correct pleadings and transcripts, writing an appellate brief is time consuming and complicated. In fact, writing a good appellate brief is an art. If one is not familiar with the appellate court rules, the appeal may be dismissed.
Can I appeal “lack of evidence”?
As explained above, generally, no. The appellate court does not act as a new jury or new fact-finder. While there are circumstances in which you can allege that the lower court should have dismissed the case for insufficient evidence, those cases are rare. The appellate court will look for mistakes in the process, and will not substitute its judgment of the facts for that of a jury or lower court judge.
Can the state appeal a “not guilty” verdict?
No! Once the jury has found you not guilty, double jeopardy prevents the State from appealing the jury’s decision. That is a fundamental protection of the U.S. Constitution.
However, the State CAN APPEAL the granting certain motions. If you move to suppress evidence, alleging that it was illegally obtained, and the trial court judge grants your motion, then the State can appeal that decision.
What is an “appellate brief”?
An appellate brief is the actual document that contains the issues and arguments. Think of it as a laundry list of gripes and complaints. The brief has to have a complete and accurate statement of the facts, and arguments that are supported by case law. Most criminal defense attorneys have never even started an appeal, much less written an appellate brief. Joe Bodiford has personally authored dozens of successful appellate briefs in criminal cases.
Can I prove ineffective assistance of counsel on appeal?
No. That issue is reserved for post-conviction motions (Rule 3.850 in State court, or 18 U.S.C. 2254 and 2255 in Federal court). There are reported cases where an appellate court reversed a case because of ineffective trial attorneys, but those cases are rare and only seen in extreme cases of bad counsel.
What happens if I win on appeal?
That depends on WHAT you are appealing. If you lost at a jury trial, then you may be entitled to a new trial. If you lost a suppression motion, and you win on appeal, then the case will be sent back to the lower court and the State prohibited from using the suppressed evidence. If you are appealing a sentencing issue, then you will be resentenced.
Joe Bodiford has handled countless issues on appeal, from sufficiency of the evidence, to sentencing issues, to suppression issues, and highly-technical jury instruction issues. He has also handled the appeal of post-conviction motions in both State and Federal appellate courts.
Call today for to discuss your case - just because you were convicted does not mean that the case is over. As Florida appeals attorney Joe Bodiford always says - “it’s just halftime, there’s a lot of game left to play.”
Thu, 09 May 2013 19:15:55 +0000 Defendant cannot waive statute of limitations in Florida as to lesser offenses Cartegena v. State, 38 Fla. L. Weekly D1017D (Fla. 4th DCA May 8, 2013): HELD: Where a defendant has asserted the statute of limitations to prevent prosecution of some old (and time-barred) charged crimes arising out of the same criminal episode as another old charge (that is not time-barred) in order to avoid prosecution for those […]
On February 19, the Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral argument in U.S. Department of Commerce v. U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, a dispute over evidence in a challenge to the Trump administration’s decision to reinstate a question about citizenship on the 2020 census. The justices agreed in November […]
The saga over Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s health seems to ebb and flow from the headlines almost daily. Part of the mystery relates to the amount of information shared with the public. We know that, while treating Ginsburg for rib fractures, doctors found malignant lesions in her lungs that were promptly removed, and that subsequent […]
During yesterday’s argument in Knick v. Township of Scott – the second time the court has heard the case this term – the justices seemed to be looking for a compromise position. The court granted review in the case to decide whether to overrule a 1985 precedent, Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank, […]
For this blog, in a post that first appeared at Howe on the Court, Amy Howe analyzes yesterday’s oral argument in Tennessee Wine & Spirits Retailers Association v. Blair, a challenge to Tennessee’s durational residency requirements for liquor licensing. For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that “Supreme Court justices indicated … that they thought […]
Yesterday morning’s argument in Home Depot U.S.A. v. Jackson was a notable one, as Justice Elena Kagan brought a strong view of the case to the bench and proceeded to dominate the argument. The case involves the removal of litigation from state court to federal court. Under Section 1441 (and predecessor provisions dating back to […]