If you are not satisfied with the outcome of your trial, it is your right to appeal the case. Since not all criminal attorneys can handle appeals work, look specifically for a federal or Florida appeals attorney.
Information Provided by Florida Appeals Lawyer Joe Bodiford
What is an appeal?
An appeal is the process by which a higher court reviews the case for errors. Errors can be in the judge’s rulings, the sentence that was imposed, in the jury trial process. The issues are really unlimited, and are only as good as the trial lawyer that set them in motion. In other words, your trial attorney has to make motions and objections during your trial. The trial attorney has to make a good record in case you lose, so that the issues are “preserved” for the higher court to review.
An appeal is NOT a re-trial, or a time for the higher court to look at the facts and decide that someone is not guilty. While there are very limited circumstances in which an appellate court can review the facts, an appeal is a review of the PROCESS. The higher court looks to make sure that all of the legal rulings were correct and that your rights were properly protected.
When would I need to appeal?
If you have gone to trial and lost, you should appeal. If your attorney filed a motion to suppress and the judge denied it, you should appeal. If you went to hearing on a violation of probation and were found to be in violation, you should appeal.
You should appeal any adverse decision against you. If you do not, then you may be giving up not only a chance to have your case reversed, but the right to pursue other avenues of relief later. For most post-conviction motions, you have to have appealed your case first.
How do I appeal my conviction or sentence?
An appeal is a very complicated process, and should only be handled by an attorney skilled at preparing the record and writing the brief. Many trial attorneys don’t even know how to file for an appeal. Joe Bodiford regularly lectures trial attorneys in this area, in his seminar Criminal Appeals: Bridging the Gap from Trial to Appeal.
Do I need a lawyer to appeal?
Technically, no. Practically, YES. The appeals process is too complicated for someone not trained in criminal appeals—even for most criminal lawyers. Not only is it difficult to make sure the record has all the correct pleadings and transcripts, writing an appellate brief is time consuming and complicated. In fact, writing a good appellate brief is an art. If one is not familiar with the appellate court rules, the appeal may be dismissed.
Can I appeal “lack of evidence”?
As explained above, generally, no. The appellate court does not act as a new jury or new fact-finder. While there are circumstances in which you can allege that the lower court should have dismissed the case for insufficient evidence, those cases are rare. The appellate court will look for mistakes in the process, and will not substitute its judgment of the facts for that of a jury or lower court judge.
Can the state appeal a “not guilty” verdict?
No! Once the jury has found you not guilty, double jeopardy prevents the State from appealing the jury’s decision. That is a fundamental protection of the U.S. Constitution.
However, the State CAN APPEAL the granting certain motions. If you move to suppress evidence, alleging that it was illegally obtained, and the trial court judge grants your motion, then the State can appeal that decision.
What is an “appellate brief”?
An appellate brief is the actual document that contains the issues and arguments. Think of it as a laundry list of gripes and complaints. The brief has to have a complete and accurate statement of the facts, and arguments that are supported by case law. Most criminal defense attorneys have never even started an appeal, much less written an appellate brief. Joe Bodiford has personally authored dozens of successful appellate briefs in criminal cases.
Can I prove ineffective assistance of counsel on appeal?
No. That issue is reserved for post-conviction motions (Rule 3.850 in State court, or 18 U.S.C. 2254 and 2255 in Federal court). There are reported cases where an appellate court reversed a case because of ineffective trial attorneys, but those cases are rare and only seen in extreme cases of bad counsel.
What happens if I win on appeal?
That depends on WHAT you are appealing. If you lost at a jury trial, then you may be entitled to a new trial. If you lost a suppression motion, and you win on appeal, then the case will be sent back to the lower court and the State prohibited from using the suppressed evidence. If you are appealing a sentencing issue, then you will be resentenced.
Joe Bodiford has handled countless issues on appeal, from sufficiency of the evidence, to sentencing issues, to suppression issues, and highly-technical jury instruction issues. He has also handled the appeal of post-conviction motions in both State and Federal appellate courts.
Call today for to discuss your case - just because you were convicted does not mean that the case is over. As Florida appeals attorney Joe Bodiford always says - “it’s just halftime, there’s a lot of game left to play.”
Thu, 09 May 2013 19:15:55 +0000 Defendant cannot waive statute of limitations in Florida as to lesser offenses Cartegena v. State, 38 Fla. L. Weekly D1017D (Fla. 4th DCA May 8, 2013): HELD: Where a defendant has asserted the statute of limitations to prevent prosecution of some old (and time-barred) charged crimes arising out of the same criminal episode as another old charge (that is not time-barred) in order to avoid prosecution for those […]
Carpenter v. Murphy has the Supreme Court once again reviewing the troubled history of the nation’s treatment of Native Americans. The specific question is whether the reservation once afforded the Creek Nation in what is now eastern Oklahoma remains a reservation for purposes of the Major Crimes Act. If it remains a reservation, then the […]
In a series of decisions in the past decade, most recently 2017’s Hamer v. Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago, the Supreme Court has distinguished jurisdictional rules from non-jurisdictional claim-processing rules. The distinction has been framed in consequential terms — a jurisdictional rule is mandatory and does not admit of equitable exception, suspending or extending the […]
Yesterday the justices issued additional orders from their conference last Friday; as expected, they did not add any cases to their merits docket. Amy Howe covers the order list for this blog, in a post that first appeared at Howe on the Court. At Bloomberg Law, Jordan Rubin reports that the court “chose not to […]
When the justices return from their Thanksgiving vacation next week, they will hear oral argument in a would-be class action filed against the technology giant Apple by iPhone users. The iPhone users argue that Apple is violating federal antitrust laws by requiring them to buy apps only from Apple’s App Store, at inflated prices. But […]
The Roberts Court has shown two jurisprudential preferences. One is for protecting the freedom of speech, earning it a reputation as perhaps the most speech-protective Supreme Court in history. The other is for protecting law-enforcement discretion and power, especially against private suits for damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, earning criticisms from some who argue […]